Legislature(1993 - 1994)

03/04/1994 01:15 PM House JUD

Audio Topic
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
txt
  SB 239 - OIL OPERATIONS:FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY                             
                                                                               
  Number 030                                                                   
                                                                               
  ANNETTE KREITZER, Legislative Aide to the Senate Special                     
  Committee on Oil and Gas, Prime Sponsor of CSSB 239, gave a                  
  brief history of SB 239 and read from a sectional analysis,                  
  which follows:                                                               
                                                                               
  Section 1.                                                                   
                                                                               
       Subsection (b)(1)  The OFFSHORE exploration or                          
  production financial responsibility requirement of $50                       
  million is UNAFFECTED by this amendment.                                     
                                                                               
       Subsection (b)(2)  The amended language clarifies that                  
  financial responsibility should be greater for an onshore                    
  facility producing more than 10,000 barrels per day of oil,                  
  than for an onshore facility producing 2,5000 barrels or                     
  less per day.                                                                
                                                                               
       Subsection (b)(3)  Limits the financial responsibility                  
  for an onshore exploration facility to $1,000,000.                           
                                                                               
  Section 2.                                                                   
                                                                               
       Chapter 102, SLA 1992 gives the Department of                           
  Environmental Conservation the authority to waive its                        
  requirement that financial responsibility instruments                        
  provide for a direct action and appointment of an agent for                  
  service of process.  The direct action provision is NOT                      
  AVAILABLE in marine pollution insurance, and has not been                    
  available since about 1989.                                                  
                                                                               
       Section 6 of Ch. 102, SLA 1992 repealed this temporary                  
  law effective June 1, 1994.  Rather than grant another two-                  
  year exemption, the Committee Substitute repeals the                         
  repealer and allows the DEC to grant waivers until direct                    
  action again becomes available.                                              
                                                                               
  Section 3.                                                                   
                                                                               
       Makes certain there is no gap between the effective                     
  date and the date of the repeal of the former temporary                      
  waiver.                                                                      
                                                                               
  Section 4.                                                                   
                                                                               
       Immediate effective date.                                               
                                                                               
                                                                               
  In summary, MS. KREITZER said, SB 239 repeals the temporary                  
  provision to waive mandatory insurance requirements.                         
  Instead, the waiver would be established in statute.  In                     
  addition, Section 1 would reduce the mandatory liability                     
  limits to a more reasonably available level.                                 
                                                                               
  Number 158                                                                   
                                                                               
  SEN. BERT SHARP, member of the Senate Special Committee on                   
  Oil and Gas, said the current insurance requirements were                    
  prohibitively high for onshore exploration.  He said SB 239                  
  would reduce the mandatory liability limits to a more                        
  reasonable level.  He read the sponsor statement for CSSB
  239(O&G), which follows:                                                     
                                                                               
  The Oil and Gas CS for SB 239 recognizes that existing                       
  statutes mandates levels of proof of financial                               
  responsibility liability that are so unrealistic that                        
  coverage is not available and have has been.                                 
                                                                               
  This is true as much for AS 46.04.040(b) onshore oil and gas                 
  exploration activity as it is for moving refined products                    
  along the waterways of Alaska.                                               
                                                                               
  Section 1 only reduces the mandatory liability limits to                     
  more reasonably available levels.  The reduced levels are                    
  still approximately 10 times higher than other oil producing                 
  states.                                                                      
                                                                               
  The 20 million dollar requirement for onshore production                     
  facilities remains intact for facilities producing over                      
  10,000 barrels of oil per day.  Requirements are stair                       
  stepped down from over 10,000 B/P/D/, to 5,000 - 10,000,                     
  2,500 - 5,000 and 2,500 and under.  It seems to make sense                   
  that producers handling less daily volumes would create less                 
  of a spill potential.                                                        
                                                                               
  This bill provides for reductions for onshore oil and gas                    
  exploration activities that in nine out of 10 cases, never                   
  involve an exposure to on site crude oil.  If the activity                   
  is successful, the safety devices and their operations                       
  required are highly developed and effective.                                 
                                                                               
  There has never been an onshore crude spill in Alaska caused                 
  by an exploration rig.                                                       
                                                                               
  This bill is an attempt to open the door of opportunity a                    
  little bit.  This would create a more realistic environment                  
  for small independent exploration firms to operate in                        
  Alaska.                                                                      
                                                                               
  Let me point out that AS 46.04.040(b) is not the only proof                  
  of financial liability required of onshore exploration.                      
  It's only one of many.                                                       
                                                                               
  The Division of Oil and Gas requires the posting of a bond                   
  in paragraph 23 of their lease contract as well as satisfy                   
  requirements in 11 AAC 83.160.                                               
                                                                               
  The Division of Oil and Gas can also require supplemental                    
  bonding if it believes the nature of the surface and its                     
  uses or the degree of risk justifies an increased bond.                      
                                                                               
  The Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission also requires                 
  a lessee to post a separate bond of at least $100,000                        
  dollars prior to any drilling activity.                                      
                                                                               
  With many of the major oil companies now redirecting their                   
  exploration efforts overseas, it would only seem prudent to                  
  remove impossible liability requirements presently required                  
  which virtually shuts out independent exploration and                        
  producers in our state.                                                      
                                                                               
  I believe this legislation is a reasonable move to correct                   
  this situation.                                                              
                                                                               
  This bill, along with a balanced "exploration licensing"                     
  bill, may well stimulate renewed exploration activity in our                 
  state, thereby creating not only new jobs for Alaskans, but                  
  new revenue sources to the state treasury.                                   
                                                                               
  I ask for your support of this bill.                                         
                                                                               
  Number 340                                                                   
                                                                               
  There was general discussion of the resolution passed in                     
  both houses of congress regarding offshore exploration,                      
  drilling, and transportation of oil.                                         
                                                                               
  Number 380                                                                   
                                                                               
  RAY GILLESPIE, Representing the Trade Association - Refined                  
  Fuel Distributors, testified in support of SB 239.  He noted                 
  the difficulty for companies to provide the mandatory                        
  insurance.                                                                   
                                                                               
  Number 436                                                                   
                                                                               
  MIKE CONWAY, Director, Division of Spill Prevention and                      
  Response, Department of Environmental Conservation, made                     
  himself available to answer any questions the committee had                  
  regarding SB 239.                                                            
                                                                               
  Number 468                                                                   
                                                                               
  REP. NORDLUND asked what would happen in the event there is                  
  a spill and the cost of cleanup is higher than the company's                 
  insurance coverage.                                                          
                                                                               
  Number 470                                                                   
                                                                               
  MR. CONWAY responded by saying the department would ensure                   
  the company had up to one million dollars of resources to                    
  cover costs.  In the event that the damage caused by the                     
  company exceeded their means to pay, the state would fund a                  
  cleanup from the 470 Fund.                                                   
                                                                               
                                                                               
  REP. KOTT moved CSSB 239 with individual recommendations and                 
  zero fiscal note.                                                            
                                                                               
  REP. DAVIDSON objected.  A roll call vote was taken.  Voting                 
  yes:  Reps. James, Kott, Green, Nordlund and Porter.  Voting                 
  no:  Rep. Davidson.  CSSB 239 passed from committee.                         

Document Name Date/Time Subjects